Author Details

Raman Aylur Subramanian

Raman Aylur Subramanian
Managing Director, MSCI Research

Social Sharing

Extended Viewer



U.S. cap-weighted, small-cap benchmarks have historically displayed structural biases that affect performance. For example, small-cap indexes have sector, revenue and style tilts compared to the broad U.S. market. U.S. small caps are more concentrated in financials and industrials, while their revenue exposure is more domestically oriented than the broad market.

Despite showing outperformance versus their large- and mid-cap peers over the whole period, U.S. small-cap companies were also less profitable and had lower quality earnings than the broad market. Both of these tilts negatively affected returns during the period from February 1997 to December 2014.


Sources of Active Return on MSCI USA Small Cap vs. MSCI USA

Data from February 1997 to December 2014

Managers can hedge or avoid these unwanted exposures and this would have historically improved performance of their small-cap portfolios: Using the Barra US Small Cap Model, we find that an Enhanced Small Cap simulated strategy outperformed the MSCI Small Cap benchmark on a risk-adjusted basis by increasing exposure to the Earnings Quality and Profitability factors. By using equity risk models tailored to the investment universe, active managers can hedge out or avoid unwanted exposures, conserving their risk budgets for asset selection. Alternatively, managers could employ a portfolio replicating an index that seeks to tilt toward high quality small-cap companies, such as the MSCI USA Small Cap Diversified Multi-factor Index.

Read the paper, "Tilting to U.S. Small Caps."

Pagination Portlet