Extended Viewer

Manish Shakdwipee

Manish Shakdwipee

Executive Director, Head of Climate Change Research in ESG Research

Manish Shakdwipee is Executive Director, Head of Climate Change Research at MSCI ESG Research. Previously, he was head of energy consulting at Ecofirst Advisory Services, and was a risk consultant with Ernst & Young. Manish received his B.Tech. in Mechanical Engineering, and Ph.D. in Sustainable Energy Systems from Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Bombay.

Research and Insights

Articles by Manish Shakdwipee

    Understanding Carbon Exposure in Private Assets

    6 mins read Blog | Oct 14, 2021 | Manish Shakdwipee

    Public companies and managers of listed assets face growing disclosure requirements. But private companies have not received the same level of scrutiny. How can investors in private assets calculate their exposure to carbon emitters, and what can they do about it?

    Climate Change and Climate Risk: An Index Perspective

    Research Report | Jul 10, 2019 | Manish Shakdwipee , Stuart Doole

    A transition to a low-carbon economy could reduce demand for carbon-intensive products and services in favor of low-/zero-carbon counterparts. This migration in demand could also alter the risk-return profile — not only of individual companies but of some entire industries. The MSCI Climate Change Index aims to reflect these potential changes, increasing the index weight of companies identified as exposed to a low-carbon transition, while decreasing the weight in companies negatively exposed...

    Investment Risks in Carbon-Dependent Industries

    Blog | Dec 10, 2018 | Manish Shakdwipee

    Carbon-intensive industries have been the primary focus of attention for investors looking to reduce carbon-related risks in their portfolios. But these particular industries are only part of the picture. Institutional investors may want to look beyond the usual suspect carbon-intensive industries to better understand the end-to-end risks.

    How Funds Are Positioned for a Low-Carbon Future

    Blog | Oct 25, 2017 | Manish Shakdwipee

    As the world moves toward a low-carbon future, companies of many stripes are adopting renewable and clean-energy technologies. That, of course, has implications for stocks and the portfolios that hold them. How can asset owners understand the carbon-transition risks in their portfolios?

    How Resilient are Mutual Funds to the Low Carbon Transition

    Research Report | Sep 20, 2017 | Manish Shakdwipee

    A confluence of regulatory and non-regulatory factors is driving the adoption of renewable energy and other clean energy technologies globally, while headwinds facing fossil fuels continue to mount1. Measuring how one’s investments are positioned relative to this transition towards a low carbon economy can help the end investor understand what long-term bets – intended and otherwise – are embedded in their portfolios. 1 See: Regulatory Easing: Potential Impact on Energy Sector  

    How Institutional Investors Are Responding to Climate Change

    Blog | Sep 14, 2017 | Manish Shakdwipee

    How are institutional investors tackling climate-change risk in their portfolios? Thanks partly to global initiatives such as the Montreal Pledge and the Portfolio Decarbonization Coalition, both launched in 2014, many institutional investors have moved quickly to understand the long-term portfolio implications of climate change and to adopt climate-risk management techniques.

    Regulatory Easing: Potential Impact on Energy Sector

    Research Report | Jun 1, 2017 | Matt Moscardi , Manish Shakdwipee

    Using market returns as a starting point, we focus on the U.S. energy sector to better understand how the possibility of regulatory easing could affect sector, company and investor performance. For the energy sector, we suggest that regulatory changes alone may be unlikely to upend global supply and demand dynamics for fossil fuels, with renewable energy adoption driven by global market-led factors extending beyond regulations in a single market. Falling demand for fossil fuels due to...

    Comparing Carbon Estimates Against Disclosures

    Research Report | Sep 1, 2016 | Manish Shakdwipee , Linda-Eling Lee

    In December 2015, we identified 277 companies that were constituents of the MSCI ACWI Investable Market Index (IMI) that had disclosed their 2013 scope 1+2 carbon emissions in 2015 for the first time. This provided a unique opportunity to test out carbon estimation models on which institutional investors have had to rely. We found that the methods that have been around the longest – which rely on Economic Input Output Life Cycle Analysis (EIO-LCA) models – were not very accurate when...

    Scenarios, Stress Tests and Strategies for Second Quarter 2016 - The Rise of Populism

    Research Report | Jul 14, 2016 | Raghu Suryanarayanan , Thomas Verbraken , Linda-Eling Lee , Carlo Acerbi , Manish Shakdwipee , Remy Briand

    The decision by a majority of U.K. voters to leave the European Union shines a light on fissures between perceived winners and losers from globalized markets and highlights for investors the importance of factoring the consequences of inequality and popular discontent into their views. The latest edition of MSCI’s “Scenarios, Stress Tests and Strategies” examines the potential impacts on institutional portfolios of a tide of populist sentiment across Europe and the U.S.

    Implications of COP21: How do Corporate Carbon Reduction Targets Stack up?

    Research Report | Dec 15, 2015 | Manish Shakdwipee , Laura Nishikawa

    The climate deal struck in Paris set an ambitious goal of limiting the temperature rise to 2 degrees Celsius, with a stretch goal of 1.5 degrees. While the key elements of legally binding country emission reduction targets appeared to be missing, countries agreed to submit five-year updates to their emissions reduction pledges and to establish a framework for monitoring, measuring and verifying emissions reductions.

    RE EXAMINING THE TAX GAP

    Research Report | Jun 3, 2015 | Manish Shakdwipee , Gaurav Trivedi , Matt Moscardi

    Since our analysis in December 2013 on the diversity of tax rates paid by MSCI World companies, the regulatory outlook has shifted substantially. In our updated analysis, we identify 243 companies (out of 1,093 relevant1 companies within the MSCI World Index constituents) as having a large tax gap, paying an average rate of 17.7%, versus 34.0%, if these companies were paying taxes in the jurisdictions where they generate revenues.