Extended Viewer

Manish Shakdwipee

Manish Shakdwipee
Executive Director, Head of Climate Change Research in ESG Research

About the Contributor

Manish Shakdwipee is Executive Director, Head of Climate Change Research at MSCI ESG Research. Previously, he was head of energy consulting at Ecofirst Advisory Services, and was a risk consultant with Ernst & Young. Manish received his B.Tech. in Mechanical Engineering, and Ph.D. in Sustainable Energy Systems from Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Bombay.

HTML Displayer Portlet

Contributions by Manish Shakdwipee

Extended-lister

Nothing was found.
  1. A transition to a low-carbon economy could reduce demand for carbon-intensive products and services in favor of low-/zero-carbon counterparts. This migration in demand could also alter the risk-return profile — not only of individual companies but of some entire industries. The MSCI Climate Change Index aims to reflect these potential changes, increasing the index weight of companies identified as exposed to a low-carbon transition, while decreasing the weight in companies negatively exposed to such changes, while seeking to maintain broad market exposure.

  2. BLOG

    Investment risks in carbon-dependent industries 

    Dec 10, 2018 Manish Shakdwipee

    ESG Research

    Learn More

    Carbon-intensive industries have been the primary focus of attention for investors looking to reduce carbon-related risks in their portfolios. But these particular industries are only part of the picture. Institutional investors may want to look beyond the usual suspect carbon-intensive industries to better understand the end-to-end risks.

  3. BLOG

    How Funds Are Positioned for a Low-Carbon Future 

    Oct 25, 2017 Manish Shakdwipee

    ESG Research

    Learn More

    As the world moves toward a low-carbon future, companies of many stripes are adopting renewable and clean-energy technologies. That, of course, has implications for stocks and the portfolios that hold them. How can asset owners understand the carbon-transition risks in their portfolios?

  4. PAPER

    How Resilient are Mutual Funds to the Low Carbon Transition 

    Sep 20, 2017 Manish Shakdwipee

    Download Document

    A confluence of regulatory and non-regulatory factors is driving the adoption of renewable energy and other clean energy technologies globally, while headwinds facing fossil fuels continue to mount1. Measuring how one’s investments are positioned relative to this transition towards a low carbon economy can help the end investor understand what long-term bets – intended and otherwise – are embedded in their portfolios.

    1 See: Regulatory Easing: Potential Impact on Energy Sector

     

  5. BLOG

    How Institutional Investors Are Responding to Climate Change 

    Sep 14, 2017 Manish Shakdwipee

    Equity Themes , ESG Research , Fixed Income

    Learn More

    How are institutional investors tackling climate-change risk in their portfolios? Thanks partly to global initiatives such as the Montreal Pledge and the Portfolio Decarbonization Coalition, both launched in 2014, many institutional investors have moved quickly to understand the long-term portfolio implications of climate change and to adopt climate-risk management techniques.

  6. PAPER

    Regulatory Easing: Potential Impact on Energy Sector 

    Jun 1, 2017 Manish Shakdwipee , Matt Moscardi

    Responsible Investing

    Download Document

    Using market returns as a starting point, we focus on the U.S. energy sector to better understand how the possibility of regulatory easing could affect sector, company and investor performance.

    For the energy sector, we suggest that regulatory changes alone may be unlikely to upend global supply and demand dynamics for fossil fuels, with renewable energy adoption driven by global market-led factors extending beyond regulations in a single market.

    Falling demand for fossil fuels due to global factors – such as falling prices of clean technologies, aspiration for clean air and increased efforts of major energy importing nations to secure greater energy independence - paired with ‘sticky’ energy supply, may dampen the long-term impact of regulatory easing limited to single market.

  7. PAPER

    Filling the Blanks: Comparing Carbon Estimates Against Disclosures 

    Sep 1, 2016 Manish Shakdwipee , Linda-Eling Lee

    Download Document

    In December 2015, we identified 277 companies that were constituents of the MSCI ACWI Investable Market Index (IMI) that had disclosed their 2013 scope 1+2 carbon emissions in 2015 for the first time. This provided a unique opportunity to test out carbon estimation models on which institutional investors have had to rely. We found that the methods that have been around the longest – which rely on Economic Input Output Life Cycle Analysis (EIO-LCA) models – were not very accurate when compared against company disclosure. In contrast, an alternative approach developed by MSCI ESG Research which relies on historical data reported by the company or recently reported data by a sample of comparable companies produced closer estimates.

  8. PAPER

    Scenarios, Stress Tests and Strategies for Second Quarter 2016 - The Rise of Populism 

    Jul 14, 2016 Raghu Suryanarayanan , Thomas Verbraken , Linda-Eling Lee , Carlo Acerbi , Manish Shakdwipee , Remy Briand

    Download Document

    The decision by a majority of U.K. voters to leave the European Union shines a light on fissures between perceived winners and losers from globalized markets and highlights for investors the importance of factoring the consequences of inequality and popular discontent into their views. The latest edition of MSCI’s “Scenarios, Stress Tests and Strategies” examines the potential impacts on institutional portfolios of a tide of populist sentiment across Europe and the U.S.

  9. PAPER

    Issue Brief - Implications of COP21: How do corporate carbon reduction targets stack up? 

    Dec 15, 2015 Manish Shakdwipee , Laura Nishikawa

    Responsible Investing

    Download Document

    The climate deal struck in Paris set an ambitious goal of limiting the temperature rise to 2 degrees Celsius, with a stretch goal of 1.5 degrees. While the key elements of legally binding country emission reduction targets appeared to be missing, countries agreed to submit five-year updates to their emissions reduction pledges and to establish a framework for monitoring, measuring and verifying emissions reductions.

  10. PAPER

    RE EXAMINING THE TAX GAP 

    Jun 3, 2015 Gaurav Trivedi , Matt Moscardi , Manish Shakdwipee

    Download Document

    Since our analysis in December 2013 on the diversity of tax rates paid by MSCI World companies, the regulatory outlook has shifted substantially. In our updated analysis, we identify 243 companies (out of 1,093 relevant1 companies within the MSCI World Index constituents) as having a large tax gap, paying an average rate of 17.7%, versus 34.0%, if these companies were paying taxes in the jurisdictions where they generate revenues.