Q1 2026 Private Capital Benchmarks Summary
Your guide to clarity in private assets.

Private equity was divided along software lines in Q1 2026, while direct lending in private credit also felt the impact of investor concerns about legacy software businesses. Distributions for private capital overall in the quarter sagged, with private equity weaker still. Dry powder continued to ebb.

This report examines data on more than 15,500 closed-end funds globally to provide insights into the latest trends in private-capital cash flows and valuations, as well as dry powder and performance. 

 

Highlights:

  • Venture capital (VC) and buyout went their separate ways on software in the quarter. VC’s tilt toward growth-stage software and AI-native names helped sustain returns.
  • The sell-off that hit listed business-development companies in early February reached private direct-lending portfolios with IT-sector concentration, pushing quarterly returns to the lowest since 2024. 
  • The pattern of softer distributions typically seen in the first quarter was apparent in early 2026, with rates for private capital overall and private equity slipping below already muted levels. 
Buyout and venture capital split in Q1

Quarterly returns are calculated in USD using the Modified Dietz method and are not annualized. Calendar-year returns represent compounded quarterly returns. Data as of Q1 2026 from the MSCI Private Capital Universe.  

Read the full report

Provide your information for instant access to the Q4 2025 Private Capital Benchmarks Summary.

Related to private capital benchmarks

The State of Private Markets 2026

Our research examines the key forces influencing private markets, putting MSCI data and expert insight behind the themes that matter to asset owners, general partners and wealth investors.

MSCI All Country Nowcasting (Daily NAV) Indexes

From quarterly lag to daily view.

Scenario Analysis: Tracing Credit Stress Across Private and Public Market

Two stagflationary scenarios — private-credit contagion and hyperscaler repricing — each produce ~11% portfolio losses but through different channels. Identifying which dominates matters more than the headline loss.