- Only 28% of companies we analyzed recently disclosed Scope 1 and 2 emissions, and 15% disclosed any portion of their Scope 3 emissions.
- Disclosure rates were highest on average in some of the most emission-intensive sectors and lowest in the least emission-intensive sectors.
- Less than 2% of companies had set a Scope 3 target but not disclosed Scope 3 emissions.
In response to growing demand from investors, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission proposed requirements for U.S.-listed companies to disclose certain climate-related risks, beginning in 2024.1 The proposed rule, which is modeled in part on the recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD), would require companies to disclose information relevant to assessing financially material risks posed by climate change.2 The SEC’s proposal covers many aspects of disclosure, including company oversight and governance of its climate-related risks, how transition and physical risks could affect the company, metrics that quantify the company’s greenhouse-gas (GHG) emissions and any climate-related targets and goals the company has set.
To help understand whether companies are prepared to meet these proposed disclosure requirements, we assessed emission-disclosure rates of a sample set — the constituents of the MSCI USA Investable Market Index (IMI).
Emission footprints are a starting point for assessing climate-related risk
Disclosures of GHG-emission metrics are of particular interest to investors as they form the basis for further assessments of climate-related risk. How exposed is a company to carbon-pricing mechanisms and other aspects of transition risk? How comprehensive and ambitious is a company’s climate target? An investor likely needs to know a company’s GHG emissions to be able to make these assessments. Or to use a cliché: You can’t manage what you can’t measure.
The status of US-listed companies’ emission disclosures
Data as of March 23, 2022. Total universe includes the 2,565 constituents of MSCI USA Investable Market Index, as of March 22, 2022, with market cap greater than USD 75 million and which are covered by MSCI ESG Research Carbon Metrics. Data includes latest disclosures, as of 2019 or 2020. Source: MSCI ESG Research LLC
Disclosure rates of GHG emissions in this sample of companies were low: 28% of companies disclosed both Scope 1 and 2 emissions. Under the proposed rule, all companies would be required to disclose these emissions and meet attestation requirements.
Only 15% disclosed any Scope 3 emissions (i.e., those from a company’s value chain). Already low, 15% is likely an overestimate of the number of companies that may already meet proposed Scope 3 disclosure requirements. Often, companies disclose only a portion of their Scope 3 emissions, such as business travel, but not other, potentially more relevant emission categories, such as emissions from the use of the products the company sells. The proposed rule does not include an attestation requirement for Scope 3 emissions.
The proposed rule also includes requirements for companies that set emission-reduction targets that include Scope 3 emissions to disclose those emissions. We found that less than 2% of companies (45) in our sample had set targets that included Scope 3, but had not yet disclosed their Scope 3 emissions.
Average GHG-emission disclosure rates of US-listed companies by sector and scope
Data as of March 23, 2022. Total universe includes 2,565 constituents of the MSCI USA Investable Market Index, as of March 22, 2022, with market cap greater than USD 75 million and which are covered by MSCI ESG Research Carbon Metrics. Sectors are derived from the Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS®), which was jointly developed by MSCI and S&P Global Market Intelligence. Data includes latest disclosures, as of 2019 or 2020. Source: MSCI ESG Research LLC
We also looked at how disclosure rates varied on average by sector. Two results stood out.
- Disclosure rates were higher on average in some of the most emission-intensive sectors: materials (64%), utilities (55%), consumer staples (48%) and energy (47%).
- Disclosure rates were lower on average in the least emission-intensive sectors: health care (12%), financials (17%), communication services (18%) and information technology (25%).
Many companies face an uphill battle
Climate-related disclosure requirements are also becoming more common in jurisdictions outside the U.S. At least 12 jurisdictions — including the EU, Canada, China and Japan — have implemented some form of TCFD-aligned regulations. While targeting the same goal, they often vary in stringency, specificity and timeline. Regulators have listened to growing demand from investors for these disclosures. But the road ahead appears to be uphill for U.S.-listed companies, as most will have to get their emission-accounting books in order to meet these requirements (if unchanged from the current proposal) by 2024, 2025 or 2026, depending on their filing requirements.
1The rule proposed batches of disclosure requirements. The first batch covers the largest companies and would require them to disclose Scope 1 and 2 emissions beginning in 2024 and Scope 3 emissions the following year. The second batch of smaller companies would follow on the same two-year schedule, but starting in 2025. Finally, the smallest companies regulated by the SEC would be required to disclose Scope 1 and 2 emissions in 2026, but not required to disclose Scope 3 emissions. “Proposed rule: The Enhancement and Standardization of Climate-Related Disclosures for Investors.” Securities and Exchange Commission, March 21, 2022.
2The proposed rule, released on March 21, is in a 60-day comment period as of this writing, and may change.
Net-Zero Alignment: Portfolio Construction Approaches for Investors
Reported Emission Footprints: The Challenge Is Real
Measuring the Temperature of Your Portfolio
Stress Testing Portfolios for Climate-Change Risk