Equities Ownership: Concentration on the Rise?

Blog post
7 min read
Ric Marshall, Jonathan Ponder
July 11, 2022
  • Controlled companies, where more than 30% of the voting power is held by a single entity, accounted for nearly 46% of all constituents of the MSCI ACWI Index, as of Feb. 1, 2022, a 44% increase from 2015 levels.
  • Widely held companies dropped to 40% of index market cap from 52%, and the percentage of companies that were widely held dropped from 41% to just 23% — another clear indicator of increased ownership concentration.
  • Among widely held and principal-shareholder companies, universal managers BlackRock held 5% or more of 638 index constituents, (72% U.S. listed) and Vanguard held 5% or more of 424 index constituents (93% U.S. listed).
In 2022, the three most common types of strategic shareholders that we track — founders, families and state entities — were either the controlling or principal shareholder at nearly 50% of all MSCI ACWI Index constituents (as shown below). This is nearly twice as high a percentage as we reported in 2015, indicating a significant increase in large ownership blocks.1 By comparison, the percentage of index constituents that were widely held declined from 41% to just 23%, dropping from 52% of total index market cap to 40%, despite remaining the dominant ownership form in the United States and certain other developed markets.
Control level groups by index market groups
Data as of Feb. 1, 2022, based on the percentages of total market cap in USD. Combined, these three index groups comprise the full MSCI ACWI Index. Source: MSCI ESG Research
For investors this growing concentration of ownership and control of global equities could result in a loss of influence, and make engagement with listed companies more difficult, which may also have important ramifications for how companies are governed.
Ownership concentration was up
We found evidence of increased concentration of ownership among non-controlled companies as well in the charts below. Of the 902 companies we classified as principal shareholder companies this year, 230 had at least two principal-level shareholders, and 39 had at least three principal-level shareholders. In all, effective control by just two or three shareholders, i.e., having at least 30% of voting rights, was found at 112 of these principal shareholder companies.2
Ownership concentration and control in the MSCI ACWI Index increased
Data as of Feb. 1, 2022. Source: MSCI ESG Research
Control in focus
Increased concentration has also occurred among the widely held companies we examined. We observed an increase in the size and number of reported holdings of two large asset managers in particular: The Vanguard Group Inc. and BlackRock Inc. Both of these firms invest in the entire market, through various index-based funds and portfolios, and thus hold positions in thousands of companies on behalf of fee-paying clients.3 The prominence and importance of these large asset managers is highlighted in tables below. Vanguard and BlackRock were among the largest shareholders at all of the U.S. listed companies in these two lists. Largest shareholders at the 10 largest widely held companies in MSCI ACWI

Company

Market Cap (USD Trill.)

MSCI ACWI Index Share

GICS Sector4

Largest Shareholders

Apple

2.85

3.1%

Information Technology

Vanguard – 7.68%

Apple

2.85

3.1%

Information Technology

BlackRock – 6.47%

Apple

2.85

3.1%

Information Technology

Berkshire Hathaway – 5.56%

Microsoft

2.31

2.5%

Information Technology

Vanguard – 8.18%

Microsoft

2.31

2.5%

Information Technology

BlackRock – 6.87%

Nvidia

0.62

0.7%

Information Technology

Vanguard – 7.71%

Nvidia

0.62

0.7%

Information Technology

BlackRock – 7.20%

Nvidia

0.62

0.7%

Information Technology

FMR – 7.03%

Taiwan Semiconductor

0.59

0.6%

Information Technology

National Development Fund – 6.38%

Visa

0.51

0.6%

Information Technology

Vanguard – 8.50%

Visa

0.51

0.6%

Information Technology

BlackRock – 7.50%

Johnson & Johnson

0.45

0.5%

Health Care

Vanguard – 8.66%

Johnson & Johnson

0.45

0.5%

Health Care

BlackRock – 7.20%

Johnson & Johnson

0.45

0.5%

Health Care

FMR – 5.47%

JPMorgan Chase

0.45

0.5%

Financials

Vanguard – 7.99%

JPMorgan Chase

0.45

0.5%

Financials

BlackRock – 6.30%

UnitedHealth

0.44

0.5%

Health Care

Vanguard – 8.34%

UnitedHealth

0.44

0.5%

Health Care

BlackRock – 7.50%

UnitedHealth

0.44

0.5%

Health Care

FMR – 5.61%

Home Depot

0.39

0.4%

Consumer Discretionary

Vanguard – 8.30%

Home Depot

0.39

0.4%

Consumer Discretionary

BlackRock – 6.70%

Procter & Gamble

0.38

0.4%

Consumer Staples

Vanguard – 8.97%

Procter & Gamble

0.38

0.4%

Consumer Staples

BlackRock – 6.67%

Data as of Feb. 1, 2022. Source: MSCI ESG Research
Largest shareholders at the 10 largest U.S. principal shareholder companies in MSCI ACWI

Company

Market Cap (USD Trill.)

MSCI ACWI Index Share

GICS Sector

Largest Shareholders

Amazon.com

1.53

1.7%

Consumer Discretionary

Jeffrey P. Bezos – 14.00%

Amazon.com

1.53

1.7%

Consumer Discretionary

Vanguard – 6.40%

Amazon.com

1.53

1.7%

Consumer Discretionary

BlackRock – 5.50%

Tesla

0.94

1.0%

Consumer Discretionary

Elon Musk – 23.10%

Tesla

0.94

1.0%

Consumer Discretionary

Vanguard – 5.90%

Tesla

0.94

1.0%

Consumer Discretionary

BlackRock – 5.10%

Tesla

0.94

1.0%

Consumer Discretionary

Capital Ventures – 5.00%

Mastercard

0.39

0.4%

Information Technology

Mastercard Foundation – 11.00%

Mastercard

0.39

0.4%

Information Technology

Vanguard – 7.10%

Mastercard

0.39

0.4%

Information Technology

BlackRock – 6.80%

Bank of America

0.38

0.4%

Financials

Berkshire Hathaway – 12.80%

Bank of America

0.38

0.4%

Financials

Vanguard – 7.30%

Bank of America

0.38

0.4%

Financials

BlackRock – 6.20%

Broadcom

0.24

0.3%

Information Technology

Capital World – 10.20%

Broadcom

0.24

0.3%

Information Technology

Capital International – 8.50%

Broadcom

0.24

0.3%

Information Technology

Vanguard – 8.30%

Broadcom

0.24

0.3%

Information Technology

Capital Research – 8.10%

Broadcom

0.24

0.3%

Information Technology

BlackRock – 6.60%

Eli Lilly

0.24

0.3%

Health Care

Lilly Endowment – 11.60%

Eli Lilly

0.24

0.3%

Health Care

Vanguard – 7.20%

Eli Lilly

0.24

0.3%

Health Care

BlackRock – 6.10%

Eli Lilly

0.24

0.3%

Health Care

PNC Financial – 5.40%

Danaher

0.21

0.2%

Health Care

Mitchell & Steven Rales – 11.10%

Danaher

0.21

0.2%

Health Care

Vanguard – 6.8%

Danaher

0.21

0.2%

Health Care

BlackRock – 6.70%

Morgan Stanley

0.19

0.2%

Financials

MUFG – 21.60%

Morgan Stanley

0.19

0.2%

Financials

State Street – 7.40%

Morgan Stanley

0.19

0.2%

Financials

Vanguard – 6.70%

Morgan Stanley

0.19

0.2%

Financials

BlackRock – 6.10%

American Express

0.14

0.2%

Financials

Berkshire Hathaway – 18.87%

American Express

0.14

0.2%

Financials

Vanguard – 5.84%

American Express

0.14

0.2%

Financials

BlackRock – 5.80%

American Express

0.14

0.2%

Financials

Wellington – 5.17%

Deere & Co

0.12

0.1%

Industrials

Cascade – 10.00%

Deere & Co

0.12

0.1%

Industrials

Vanguard – 7.50%

Deere & Co

0.12

0.1%

Industrials

BlackRock – 5.90%

Deere & Co

0.12

0.1%

Industrials

Wellington – 5.30%

Data as of Feb. 1, 2022. Source: MSCI ESG Research
BlackRock and Vanguard also held 5% or more of voting shares at many other index constituents. Among widely held and principal shareholder companies, BlackRock held 5% or more of 638 index constituents, 458 of which were U.S. listed, with an average holding size of 7.5%. Vanguard held 5% or more of 424 index constituents, 395 of which were U.S. listed, with an average holding size of 9.4%. These figures are significant because they confirm the extent to which ownership interests and voting power at principal shareholder and widely held companies are concentrated in the hands of a relatively small number of large investors. While other researchers have reported similar findings, much of the academic scholarship in this area has focused on the social and political implications of these shifts, and concerns regarding the possibility of these large institutions exercising too much — or too little — influence over the companies in which they invest.5 Such analyses, while valuable, fail to understand the role of these huge asset managers in the equity market ecosystem. It may be more helpful to think of them as universal managers, in a refinement of the concept of the universal owner first formulated by Monks and Minow in 1995.6 This approach explicitly acknowledges that such investors are typically not the ultimate beneficial owners of these companies.
The way forward?
Last year's announcement by BlackRock that they will allow certain of their institutional clients to cast their own proxy votes, beginning in 2022, provides an example of one possible future direction for these firms, a way that explicitly acknowledges the importance of exercising shareholder rights.7 It also suggests that the apparent ownership concentration we observed may really just reflect a new way of achieving — and managing — more widely dispersed ownership. If we think of universal managers not as monolithic owners but rather as complex mechanisms whereby their many clients may ultimately exercise their shareholder rights and responsibilities more efficiently and effectively, then what we may see is not greater ownership concentration but its opposite.
Further Reading
Ownership and Control 2022: Global Equities Concentration on the Rise How Ownership Concentration Has Increased Ownership Forms and Governance Control Ownership Structures in Emerging Markets Assessing Control: Measuring And Assessing The Alignment Between Economic Exposure And Voting Power At Controlled Companies
Ric Marshall
Ric Marshall
Jonathan Ponder
Jonathan Ponder
Senior Associate, MSCI Research

Subscribe today
to have insights delivered to your inbox.

1MSCI considers companies to be whenever a single shareholder or shareholder block controls 30% or more of their voting rights. Companies with one or more shareholders or shareholder blocks holding between 10% and 30% of the companies’ voting shares are considered to be companies. For additional background, see ESG Ratings2OECD researchers arrived at similar findings in their own recent survey of global ownership trends. De La Cruz, A., Medina, A., and Tang, Y. “Owners of the World’s Listed Companies.” OECD Capital Market Series, Oct. 17, 2019.3According to their most recent reports on stewardship and engagement, both of these investors vote annually in approximately 14,000 annual meetings. For example, see:
“Investment Stewardship Annual Report: January 1 — December 31, 2021.” BlackRock, Dec. 31, 2021.
“Investment Stewardship Annual Report.” Vanguard, April 5, 2022.4The Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS®) is the standard jointly developed by MSCI and S&P Global Market Intelligence.5Bebchuk, Lucian A., and Hirst, Scott. 2019. “The Specter of the Giant Three.” Boston University Law Review 99.6Monks, Robert A.G., and Minow, Nell. 1995. Corporate Governance. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Williams, Andrew; Hawley, James. 2000. ”The Emergence of Universal Owners,” Challenge 43 no. 4 (July/August).7Posner, Cydney S. “BlackRock to Permit Some Clients to Vote.” Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, Oct. 5, 2021.

The content of this page is for informational purposes only and is intended for institutional professionals with the analytical resources and tools necessary to interpret any performance information. Nothing herein is intended to recommend any product, tool or service. For all references to laws, rules or regulations, please note that the information is provided “as is” and does not constitute legal advice or any binding interpretation. Any approach to comply with regulatory or policy initiatives should be discussed with your own legal counsel and/or the relevant competent authority, as needed.