Liquidity Risk Management for Funds: Part 2: Best Practices for Stress Testing
Research Paper
July 24, 2020
Preview
This is the second in a series of research papers proposing MSCI's best practices for fund liquidity risk management. Here we propose best practices for liquidity stress testing at funds, drawing on guidelines from the European Securities and Markets Authority for undertakings for the collective investment in transferable securities (UCITS) and alternative investment funds. When designing market stress tests, we create both historical and hypothetical scenarios. Both cover at least three levels of severity from moderate to extreme.
Access our research paper Liquidity Risk Management for Funds Part 1: Dilution Effects for more insights, and refer to a wide range of regulatory risk solutions including upcoming ESMA stress testing guidelines.
Access our research paper Liquidity Risk Management for Funds Part 1: Dilution Effects for more insights, and refer to a wide range of regulatory risk solutions including upcoming ESMA stress testing guidelines.
Read the full paper
Read the full paper
Provide your information for instant access to our research papers.
The content of this page is for informational purposes only and is intended for institutional professionals with the analytical resources and tools necessary to interpret any performance information. Nothing herein is intended to recommend any product, tool or service. For all references to laws, rules or regulations, please note that the information is provided “as is” and does not constitute legal advice or any binding interpretation. Any approach to comply with regulatory or policy initiatives should be discussed with your own legal counsel and/or the relevant competent authority, as needed.