What’s the downside in real estate?

Blog post

October 4, 2019

Real estate is a cyclical asset class, and investors are exposed to potentially dramatic falls in asset values. But every cycle is different, and turning points have historically been hard to predict.
MSCI data shows that falls in asset values have been relatively infrequent, but have also varied considerably in their magnitude and duration.
While falling asset values are a risk to investor portfolios, diversification and income returns have in the past provided investors with some protection.

With inelastic supply and a strong correlation to economic growth, real estate has always been a cyclical asset class, with periods of expansion followed by sometimes painful corrections. That every cycle is different poses a challenge for investors, and it has proven extremely hard to predict turning points. However, investors may seek to mitigate their exposure to downside risk through diversification and long lease-driven income returns. The graphic below uses data from MSCI's Global Annual Property Index, as well as several other national-market indexes, to compare past downturns in which asset values fell by more than 5%. The results show that, while corrections have occurred relatively infrequently, they have varied considerably in their magnitude and duration.

Property markets have corrected and recovered in a variety of ways

Country	Peak	Trough	Recovery	Max asset-value fall
Country Ireland	Peak Dec 1984	Trough Dec 1986	Recovery Dec 1988	Max asset-value fall -7%
Country U.K.	Peak Nov 1989	Trough May 1993	Recovery Jul 1999	Max asset-value fall -25%
Country Australia	Peak Dec 1989	Trough Sep 1993	Recovery Mar 2002	Max asset-value fall -32%
Country Sweden	Peak Dec 1990	Trough Dec 1994	Recovery Dec 2006	Max asset-value fall -43%
Country Ireland	Peak Dec 1990	Trough Dec 1993	Recovery Jun 1996	Max asset-value fall -14%
Country Germany	Peak Dec 1995	Trough Dec 2010	Recovery Dec 2018	Max asset-value fall -17%
Country U.K.	Peak Jun 2007	Trough Jul 2009	Recovery Ongoing	Max asset-value fall -43%
Country Ireland	Peak Dec 2007	Trough Mar 2013	Recovery Ongoing	Max asset-value fall -67%
Country Spain	Peak Dec 2007	Trough Dec 2013	Recovery Dec 2018	Max asset-value fall -30%
Country Portugal	Peak Dec 2007	Trough Dec 2013	Recovery Ongoing	Max asset-value fall -21%
Country Global Index	Peak Dec 2007	Trough Dec 2009	Recovery Dec 2015	Max asset-value fall -20%
Country France	Peak Dec 2007	Trough Dec 2009	Recovery Jun 2016	Max asset-value fall -16%
Country Sweden	Peak Dec 2007	Trough Dec 2009	Recovery Dec 2011	Max asset-value fall -9%
Country Norway	Peak Dec 2007	Trough Dec 2009	Recovery Dec 2014	Max asset-value fall -8%
Country Belgium	Peak Dec 2007	Trough Dec 2013	Recovery Ongoing	Max asset-value fall -7%
Country Japan	Peak Feb 2008	Trough Nov 2012	Recovery Ongoing	Max asset-value fall -22%
Country U.S.	Peak Mar 2008	Trough Mar 2010	Recovery Dec 2014	Max asset-value fall -31%
Country New Zealand	Peak Mar 2008	Trough Jun 2011	Recovery Dec 2014	Max asset-value fall -13%
Country Australia	Peak Mar 2008	Trough Dec 2009	Recovery Dec 2013	Max asset-value fall -13%
Country Italy	Peak Jun 2008	Trough Dec 2015	Recovery Ongoing	Max asset-value fall -15%
Country Netherlands	Peak Sep 2008	Trough Jun 2014	Recovery Jun 2018	Max asset-value fall -19%
Country Canada	Peak Sep 2008	Trough Mar 2010	Recovery Jun 2011	Max asset-value fall -8%

Real estate corrected less often than stocks

Corrections in real estate have occurred relatively infrequently. For instance, since its inception in December 1998, the MSCI U.S. Quarterly Property Index's asset values have fallen only twice — by 3% after the dot-com bubble burst in 2001 and by 31% during the global financial crisis. By contrast, equity benchmark the MSCI USA Index, measured quarterly, saw five periods where index levels declined for two or more consecutive quarters between December 1998 and June 2019. However, the explanation probably lies at least partially in the illiquid nature of commercial real estate and the appraisal smoothing in valuation-based real estate indexes. Most of the real estate corrections on record are correlated with recessions. Of the 21 national-market corrections in the table above, 19 coincided with economic recessions. The most pronounced fall occurred in Ireland in the aftermath of the global financial crisis. Asset values there fell by 67% over 21 quarters; and after a further 25 quarters, asset values were still 38% below their pre-crisis peak. Another large fall in asset values occurred after the Swedish banking crisis in the early 1990s, when Swedish asset values fell by 43% over four years and then took another 12 years to return to their prior peak. While the corrections in Ireland and Sweden were severe, it is important to note that the timing, magnitude and duration of asset-value falls have varied considerably. For that reason, international diversification may have provided investors with a means to mitigate their exposure to asset-value falls.

Diversification and income steadied returns

Even within countries, geographic diversification and property type may also have helped asset owners reduce their exposure to the most severe asset-value falls. For example, while asset values in the U.S. fell by 3% overall after the dot-com bubble burst, office asset values saw a peak-to-trough fall of 7%, while retail asset values increased by 11% over the same period. Similarly, office assets in San Francisco lost 20% of their value between March 2001 and September 2003, but office assets in New York City increased in value by 1% over the same period. We should note that even when asset values have fallen, income returns provided some support to investors. While asset values in Ireland were still 38% below their pre-financial-crisis peak, as of June 2019, total returns of the MSCI Ireland Quarterly Property Index rose by 30% from its pre-crisis peak and generated a positive annualized total return of 2.3% over that period. That said, with income returns at historical lows in many markets, income returns may not provide the same level of cushioning that they did in the past. In a low-income environment, investors can still consider greater diversification as a way to mitigate their downside risk.

Subscribe today
to have insights delivered to your inbox.

The content of this page is for informational purposes only and is intended for institutional professionals with the analytical resources and tools necessary to interpret any performance information. Nothing herein is intended to recommend any product, tool or service. For all references to laws, rules or regulations, please note that the information is provided “as is” and does not constitute legal advice or any binding interpretation. Any approach to comply with regulatory or policy initiatives should be discussed with your own legal counsel and/or the relevant competent authority, as needed.

Featured solutions bring together a variety of products to create approaches customized to your needs

MSCI Research Weekly

By topic

By asset class

Geospatial Asset Intelligence

Index categories

Index resources

MSCI All Country Venture-Backed Private Company Indexes

By asset class

By theme

Understanding market disruption

Who we are

News and events

Innovation

Grow with us

What’s the downside in real estate?

Subscribe today
to have insights delivered to your inbox.

Featured solutions bring together a variety of products to create approaches customized to your needs

MSCI Research Weekly

By topic

By asset class

Geospatial Asset Intelligence

Index categories

Index resources

MSCI All Country Venture-Backed Private Company Indexes

By asset class

By theme

Understanding market disruption

Who we are

News and events

Innovation

Grow with us

What’s the downside in real estate?

Subscribe todayto have insights delivered to your inbox.

Subscribe today
to have insights delivered to your inbox.