Data-Center Holdings Resilient as Private-Equity Returns Fell

Quick take
2 min read
August 19, 2026

Private-capital investments in data centers and associated businesses posted higher returns than private equity overall for a third consecutive quarter in Q1 2026 amid the AI theme’s continued prominence across private and public markets.

The new MSCI Private Capital Data Center Ecosystem Holdings Index returned 5.6% in the first quarter, compared to a drop of 0.7% for global private-equity holdings and a similar decline for global public equities. The drive toward the builders of AI is the same force that knocked legacy-software buyout holdings in Q1.

Over longer horizons, the Ecosystem Holdings Index also outpaced broader private-equity holdings, returning 22.7% and 18.7% annualized over the past one and three years, respectively.

Operators and the value chain

The Ecosystem Holdings Index combines two sub-indexes. An index for operators tracks colocation facilities, operating companies and development land, and an index for the value chain captures the businesses enabling data-center operations (while excluding direct property exposure). The operator segment accounts for roughly two-thirds of holdings valuation in the Ecosystem Holdings Index, up from just over 40% in late 2022, as the investment theme has leaned to the physical infrastructure buildout for AI.

Together, the indexes aggregate performance across asset classes and entity types in private capital, ranging from physical facilities held in real-estate and infrastructure vehicles to the companies held in buyout and venture funds. They aim to give investors a consistent view of a rapidly growing opportunity set that has until now been split across mandates.

Positive past performance for data centers 
Table-style chart comparing annual returns (2021-2025) and quarterly returns (Q2 2025-Q1 2026) across the Data Center Ecosystem Holdings Index and its two sub-indexes (Operator, Value Chain) against the MSCI Global Private Equity Holdings Index and MSCI ACWI IMI. The Ecosystem Holdings Index returned 21.3%, 8.9%, 15.4%, 16.3% and 20.5% annually from 2021 through 2025, versus 45.3%, -6.0%, 9.5%, 8.2% and 14.5% for global private equity holdings over the same period. In Q1 2026 the Ecosystem Holdings Index returned 5.6% while global private equity holdings fell 0.7% and MSCI ACWI IMI fell 0.9%, continuing a pattern of data-center resilience during a weaker quarter for both public and private equity.

Gross-of-fees performance for the MSCI Private Capital Data Center Ecosystem Holdings Index, MSCI Private Capital Data Center Operator Holdings Index, MSCI Private Capital Data Center Value Chain Holdings Index and MSCI Global Private Equity Holdings Index. As of Q1 2026, the Ecosystem Holdings Index comprised 1,093 holdings, 522 of them active and in total worth USD 152.5 billion. Past performance — whether actual, backtested or simulated — is no indication or guarantee of future performance. Data as of Q1 2026. 

Subscribe today
to have insights delivered to your inbox.

Private Asset Solutions

Integrated intelligence for private markets

The Rise and Concentration Risk of Data Centers in Private Markets

Data centers have become mainstream in private markets, with investment performance that has eclipsed comparable infrastructure, private-equity and public-equity benchmarks. Risks remain, however.

Private Capital in Focus: VC and Buyout Part Ways on Software

Venture capital and buyout went in opposite directions in Q1 2026, driven in part by differing valuations of software holdings. Returns in private credit weren't immune to software pressures either.

The content of this page is for informational purposes only and is intended for institutional professionals with the analytical resources and tools necessary to interpret any performance information. Nothing herein is intended to recommend any product, tool or service. For all references to laws, rules or regulations, please note that the information is provided “as is” and does not constitute legal advice or any binding interpretation. Any approach to comply with regulatory or policy initiatives should be discussed with your own legal counsel and/or the relevant competent authority, as needed.